Release Date: Wednesday 9 April,
2003
CIGARETTE
TAXES A KEY TO REDUCING SMOKING RATES
Comprehensive cigarette advertising bans and
high cigarette taxes are some of the keys to reducing
smoking rates, according to a leading American
health economist.
Dr Frank Chaloupka, a professor at the University
of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Economics,
told delegates at the opening of the 2nd Australian
Tobacco Control Conference in Melbourne today
that high cigarette taxes, coupled with measures
such as bans on cigarette advertising and promotion,
consumer information and restrictions on public
smoking are effective ways to reduce smoking rates.
Presenting his keynote address by video, Dr Chaloupka
told the conference that cigarette taxes between
two thirds and four fifths of cigarette prices
are a good target for developing countries, where
taxes tend to be well below this level.
"Higher cigarette taxes are a triple whammy
for smoking rates - they work by enducing quitting,
reducing the amount people smoke, and preventing
people from starting in the first place."
Dr Chaloupka told conference delegates that bans
on cigarette advertising and promotions can reduce
the amount of cigarettes being smoked by 6.3%,
and well resourced anti-smoking advertising campaigns
can reduce smoking rates by about 2% a year.
Dr Chaloupka said there is a direct correlation
between the price of cigarettes and the level
of smoking.
"Research shows that if the real price of
cigarettes falls, cigarette consumption will increase.
Conversely, increasing the price of cigarettes
in the United States and many other countries
has led to a marked decline in youth smoking rates."
Dr Chaloupka said increasing cigarette prices
was more effective in preventing young people
from smoking than measures such as restricting
access to cigarettes.
"There is mixed evidence of the effectiveness
of restricting young people's access to cigarettes,
because this is only successful if it is aggressively
enforced," he said.
Dr Chaloupka said increased taxes must be part
of other measures, including
* increased health information to smokers through
dissemination of
research findings, effective warning labels and
anti-smoking advertising campaigns;
* comprehensive bans on cigarette advertising
and promotion;
* restrictions on smoking in public places and
workplaces; and
* increased access to products to help smokers
quit.
Dr Chaloupka said increasing access to nicotine
patches and gum, as well as other methods to help
smokers quit, is also a highly effective measure
in reducing smoking rates.
"Nicotine replacement therapies like patches
and gum doubles the effectiveness of quitting
efforts."
"In light of this, governments around the
world should consider subsidising these products
for lower income smokers and include coverage
of smoking cessation services in public health
insurance programs."
Dr Chaloupka says that in the next 100 years,
around 1 billion people across the world will
die from smoking related illnesses, and most of
these deaths will occur in developing countries.
"Tobacco deaths worldwide are large and
growing, and have higher burdens among the poor."
Dr Chaloupka said measures that had been shown
to be ineffective in reducing smoking rates included
prohibition, tobacco crop substitution and trade
restrictions.
For more information please contact Zoe Furman
on (03) 9635 5517 or email zoe.furman@cancervic.org.au

|